Coil Master 316L Wire

You found cheaper on another website ?
A question about this product ?
- +
2,20 €
Remaining 29,90 € To benefit with free shipping costs Express delivery is offered from 45.90€
Shipments same day Guarantee See condition
199
Reviews

Cable Coil Master 316L Wire, The Stainless Steel 316L of Coil Master.The wire allows you to effectuate your reconstructable atomisers and drippers. The Stainless Steel 316L  hs a roundness and softeness than in Kanthal. The Coil Master 3616L wire may be used in Watt Mode, Temperature Control and TCR mode with boxes which dispose of these qualities. 

The Cable Coil Master 316L wire is sold in a 9m Bobine in a  Plastic Reel. 

  • 26 AWG = 0.40mm
  • 28 AWG = 0.32mm

Made By Coil Master.

 

Features
Material SS 316
Manufacturer Coil Master
More details

COIL MASTER 316L WIRE

 

To fabricate the coil for your recontructable atomisers and dripper, Coil Master proposes the Coil Master 316L Wire. This cable is in Stainless Steel 316L or Steel. This cable allows you to perform. The Stainless Steel 316L renders a more round and soft touch and is more flexible than in Kanthal. The Coil Master 316L Wire may be used in Watt Mode, Temperature Control and TCR mode with boxes which dispose of these qualities. For the TCR mode ( Coefficient  Temperature of the Coil), the Stainless Steel 316L has a coefficiency of 100ppm.

The cable Coil Master 316L wire is sold in a 9m Bobine in a Plastic Reel 

  • 26 AWG = 0.40mm
  • 28 AWG = 0.32mm

Examples Of Construction :

  • 8 tours in SS316L of 0.40mm (26 AWG) in a diameter of 2.5mm = 0.50 Ω (roughly)
  • 12 tours in SS316L of 0.50mm (24 AWG) in a diameter of 2.5mm = 0.50 Ω (roughly)

 

Product Reviews
  • Number of Reviews : 199
  • Average Grade : 4.5 /5
  • P. Francisco
  •  the 07/02/2019
  • 5/5
Is what's in the label. Expect some residue, probably machining oil
  • B. Marc
  •  the 29/01/2019
  • 4/5
"Pour mon premier montage dripper, je trouve ce fil assez mou mais tout de même facile d'utilisation."
  • F. Benoit
  •  the 24/01/2019
  • 5/5
"À tester"
  • C. Christophe
  •  the 15/01/2019
  • 5/5
"tres bien"
  • I. Aldo
  •  the 08/01/2019
  • 3/5
Normal
  • V. Nicolas
  •  the 06/01/2019
  • 5/5
Conforme
  • G. Timoté
  •  the 25/12/2018
  • 5/5
Bien.
  • F. Daubin
  •  the 25/12/2018
  • 3/5
"Manque des tutos"
  • G. Maxime
  •  the 28/11/2018
  • 4/5
"Fait le job"
  • D. Veronique
  •  the 28/11/2018
  • 5/5
"Satisfait ..."
More reviews...